<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Estonian Internet Awards 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.altex-marketing.com/estonian-internet-awards-2009/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.altex-marketing.com/estonian-internet-awards-2009</link>
	<description>Internet marketing news, views and other stuff related to the Baltics and beyond</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Gurney</title>
		<link>http://www.altex-marketing.com/estonian-internet-awards-2009#comment-75642</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Gurney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altex-marketing.com/?p=1618#comment-75642</guid>
		<description>Hi Margus, this comment came from the jury and I have asked for an explanation. As soon as i get an answer I will post it here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Margus, this comment came from the jury and I have asked for an explanation. As soon as i get an answer I will post it here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: margus</title>
		<link>http://www.altex-marketing.com/estonian-internet-awards-2009#comment-75634</link>
		<dc:creator>margus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altex-marketing.com/?p=1618#comment-75634</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but in which way is www.bjork.norden.ee "conveniet for RSS readers"? FireFox can't seem to find a feed on that site and so can't Google Reader... Am I missing something or are You?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but in which way is <a href="http://www.bjork.norden.ee" rel="nofollow">http://www.bjork.norden.ee</a> &#8220;conveniet for RSS readers&#8221;? FireFox can&#8217;t seem to find a feed on that site and so can&#8217;t Google Reader&#8230; Am I missing something or are You?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Gurney</title>
		<link>http://www.altex-marketing.com/estonian-internet-awards-2009#comment-75466</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Gurney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altex-marketing.com/?p=1618#comment-75466</guid>
		<description>Mika - I did not say "only because they look good". 
I said that:

Some (not all btw) campaigns that produced excellent results did not make the shortlist because design was “average” - this is wrong in my opinion.

I agree some were given awards where design was not the main criteria but the design-influenced majority was still clearly present.

Still -  a step in the right direction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mika - I did not say &#8220;only because they look good&#8221;.<br />
I said that:</p>
<p>Some (not all btw) campaigns that produced excellent results did not make the shortlist because design was “average” - this is wrong in my opinion.</p>
<p>I agree some were given awards where design was not the main criteria but the design-influenced majority was still clearly present.</p>
<p>Still -  a step in the right direction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mika Tuupola</title>
		<link>http://www.altex-marketing.com/estonian-internet-awards-2009#comment-75464</link>
		<dc:creator>Mika Tuupola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.altex-marketing.com/?p=1618#comment-75464</guid>
		<description>Edgar was awarded mostly because of results. Edgar design was horrible (maybe on purpose). New World Library was even more horrible design. It was awarded because of the idea. So I would not say projects were awarded only because they look good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edgar was awarded mostly because of results. Edgar design was horrible (maybe on purpose). New World Library was even more horrible design. It was awarded because of the idea. So I would not say projects were awarded only because they look good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

